Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to evaluate the Open-Vocabulary Segmentation results in Table 2? #5

Open
Glupapa opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@Glupapa
Copy link

Glupapa commented Jan 5, 2024

Hi,

Thank you for sharing your impressive work!

I got confused about Table 2: How are the open vocabulary segmentation metrics calculated?
Also, could you please explain how Osprey outputs the mask to calculate these metrics?

Thanks for your help!

@CircleRadon
Copy link
Owner

Hi, @Glupapa
For open-vocabulary segmentation, all approaches employ ground truth boxes/masks as input to assess regional recognition capability. We leverage the semantic similarity as the matching measurement to calculate these metrics. We will release the codes for performance evaluation.
Actually, the current version of Osprey lacks the capability to generate output masks.

@Glupapa
Copy link
Author

Glupapa commented Jan 5, 2024

Thanks for your prompt response!
I noticed that the metrics used on Cityscapes and ADE20K-150 in Table2 are PQ, AP and mIoU, so I'm curious about how to calculate these metrics if Osprey may not output a mask. Could you please shed some light on this?
Thank you once again for your assistance.

@CircleRadon
Copy link
Owner

@Glupapa The groundtruth masks are used in calculating these metrics.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants