Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rely on a common/proven/maintained models retrieval logic #1246

Open
drzraf opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Rely on a common/proven/maintained models retrieval logic #1246

drzraf opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@drzraf
Copy link

drzraf commented May 3, 2024

Every new OCR solution seems to rely on its own set of model. EasyOCR, DocTR, OpenMMLab's MMOCR, ...
It's even worst when model are not retrieved from their upstream/official location leading to all sort of question about performances, training, ... (Dozens of issues in the project bugtracker about dbnet18, dbnet50, custom model, ...)

MMOCR seems to provide many models (and a clear list) https://mmocr.readthedocs.io/en/dev-1.x/modelzoo.html
Don't you think all the zip/download/config could be removed/unified so that model list/choice/selection is abstracted instead of being repeated with as many hardcoded-list as there are Python OCR projects?

The immediate benefit is that one can keep its usual codebase / library and switch/compare models with little to no changes involved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant