Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT]: "White label" possibility #1256

Open
RahSwe opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

[FEAT]: "White label" possibility #1256

RahSwe opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@RahSwe
Copy link

RahSwe commented May 1, 2024

What would you like to see?

An option to white label an ALLM instance:

  1. Remove ALLM references on login screen (instead using the custom logo)
  2. Remove ALLM buttons on the bottom of the workspace field
@RahSwe RahSwe added enhancement New feature or request feature request labels May 1, 2024
@timothycarambat
Copy link
Member

Remove ALLM buttons on the bottom of the workspace field

Where is this?

@timothycarambat timothycarambat added UI/UX and removed enhancement New feature or request labels May 1, 2024
@RahSwe
Copy link
Author

RahSwe commented May 1, 2024

Here (could for example be viewable only for administrators)

image

@timothycarambat
Copy link
Member

Footer icons are already customizable
Screenshot 2024-05-01 at 4 52 55 PM

The login screen icon is for sure a regression, we need to add the custom logo back to the screen like it used to work

@RahSwe
Copy link
Author

RahSwe commented May 1, 2024

Sorry, did not realize you could remove them by those options, will try out

@RahSwe
Copy link
Author

RahSwe commented May 2, 2024

Edit: I can not remove them completely but can add another icons and other links. Would be nice to have the option to remove them by setting a blank/unpressable button instead of the standard or such, to avoid having to use dummy links

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants