Reorganize Profile Section in Web Module for Improved Usability

[prbhtkumr]

Issue Summary:

The current profile section in the web module appears cluttered with multiple protocols and products, making it challenging for users to navigate and select profiles efficiently. This issue proposes reorganizing the profile section to enhance user experience.

Proposed Changes:

• Separate Section for Profiles:
  Introduce a separate section for profiles to declutter the existing profile selection interface.

• Improved Categorization:
  Group profiles based on protocols and products to make it more intuitive for users.

Screenshot:

Implementation Plan:

• Identify the relevant HTML templates and JavaScript files responsible for rendering the web interface.
• Introduce modifications to separate the profile section and improve categorization.

Benefits:

• Enhances user experience by providing a more organized and user-friendly profile selection interface.
• Simplifies the process of selecting profiles, especially when dealing with multiple protocols and products.

[prbhtkumr]

I am new to the project and would like to work on this issue.
As a newcomer, I'd really appreciate mentorship or guidance through the codebase.
Could you please assign me this issue? @securestep9

[vikas-chaudhary-2802]

@prbhtkumr Claim
i start working on it

[prbhtkumr]

@prbhtkumr Claim i start working on it

Hey @vikas-chaudhary-2802
Thank you for showing interest in this issue.

Currently, there's an ongoing code refactoring initiative in progress, and I would like to align my efforts with this issue as I'm relatively new to the project and it offers a great learning opportunity.

I hope you understand.

However, there are plenty of other exciting areas within the project where your contributions would be highly valuable. I encourage you to explore other open issues or functionalities that interest you.

If you have any questions or need assistance finding another area to contribute, feel free to ask. I look forward to seeing your contributions to the project!

[securestep9]

There is indeed some refactoring going on. As this improvement was proposed by @prbhtkumr it is only fair for him to work on it in own fork. For you @vikas-chaudhary-2802 I suggest to have a look at the the pagination feature in crawler results #805