You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have downloaded the mapper weights from here, and I found that there is only one weight file for each image encoder. I would like to sincerely ask, does this weight file represent the "Object+Style" model in the paper?
If so, would you release the "Object-Centric" and "Artist-Style" models in the near future? I'm very interested in performance comparisons between models fine-tuned on different sets (e.g., DINO Object-Centric outperforms DINO Object + Style on style Recall@10 as shown in Figure 5 in the paper, which is a bit counterintuitive).
Thanks again for your contribution to the community! Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for the late response. Yes, the weight files are all "Object+Style" models. I also updated the repo so that the "Object-Centric" and "Artist-Style" models can be downloaded by running bash weights/download_style_object_ablation.sh. You might need to git pull the latest version of the repo. Thanks!
Hi author,
Thanks for your wonderful work!
I have downloaded the mapper weights from here, and I found that there is only one weight file for each image encoder. I would like to sincerely ask, does this weight file represent the "Object+Style" model in the paper?
If so, would you release the "Object-Centric" and "Artist-Style" models in the near future? I'm very interested in performance comparisons between models fine-tuned on different sets (e.g., DINO Object-Centric outperforms DINO Object + Style on style Recall@10 as shown in Figure 5 in the paper, which is a bit counterintuitive).
Thanks again for your contribution to the community! Looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: