Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rust website/docs wanted features & bugfixes #1011

Open
2 tasks done
ojeda opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 7 comments
Open
2 tasks done

Rust website/docs wanted features & bugfixes #1011

ojeda opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 7 comments
Labels
meta Meta issue.

Comments

@ojeda
Copy link
Member

ojeda commented May 30, 2023

Features that we would like to see:


Bugs that we would like to see fixed:

@ojeda ojeda added the meta Meta issue. label May 30, 2023
@microcassidy
Copy link

@ojeda
Copy link
Member Author

ojeda commented Jun 4, 2023

@xuky76 What do you mean? That URLs like that could be used to show the table?

@yerke
Copy link

yerke commented May 27, 2024

@ojeda do you need standalone installers for stable versions earlier than 1.8? I imagine not, right?
All others are now covered in https://forge.rust-lang.org/infra/archive-stable-version-installers.html

@ojeda
Copy link
Member Author

ojeda commented May 27, 2024

Thanks for asking!

Yeah, Rust for Linux does not need them. We are more than happy with Rust 1.62.0 and later, since that is the version that the oldest supported LTS that has Rust (which was also the first).

Though perhaps other people/project could perhaps want them for historical reasons, e.g. Compiler Explorer currently has all major versions since 1.0.0 to play with.

@ojeda
Copy link
Member Author

ojeda commented May 27, 2024

@yerke By the way, I just noticed the page contains Rust 1.8.0 twice.

@yerke
Copy link

yerke commented May 27, 2024

@ojeda oh, thanks for catching it.

@ojeda
Copy link
Member Author

ojeda commented May 27, 2024

My pleasure!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta Meta issue.
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants