Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on May 01, 2024 #39346

Closed
eladkal opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 24 comments
Closed

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on May 01, 2024 #39346

eladkal opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 24 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented May 1, 2024

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider airbyte: 3.8.0rc1

Provider amazon: 8.21.0rc1

Provider apache.beam: 5.7.0rc1

Provider apache.livy: 3.8.0rc1

Provider apache.spark: 4.8.0rc2

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 8.2.0rc1

Provider common.sql: 1.13.0rc1

Provider databricks: 6.4.0rc1

Provider datadog: 3.6.0rc1

Provider dbt.cloud: 3.8.0rc1

Provider fab: 1.1.0rc1

Provider google: 10.18.0rc1

Provider hashicorp: 3.7.0rc2

Provider http: 4.11.0rc1

Provider jdbc: 4.3.0rc1

Provider microsoft.azure: 10.1.0rc1

Provider odbc: 4.6.0rc1

Provider openai: 1.2.0rc1

Provider openlineage: 1.7.1rc1

Provider pagerduty: 3.7.0rc2

Provider pinecone: 2.0.0rc1

Provider postgres: 5.11.0rc1

Provider qdrant: 1.1.0rc1

Provider salesforce: 5.7.0rc2

Provider slack: 8.7.0rc1

Provider snowflake: 5.5.0rc1

Provider teradata: 2.1.0rc1

All users involved in the PRs:
@mobuchowski @josix @mateuslatrova @kacpermuda @dabla @Anush008 @jedcunningham @boraberke @pankajastro @Taragolis @gopidesupavan @hussein-awala @wlinamchurch @nathadfield @pankajkoti @potiuk @Kylea650

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@eladkal eladkal added kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases labels May 1, 2024
@nathadfield
Copy link
Collaborator

@eladkal #39248 and #38736 tested and working correctly.

@dabla
Copy link
Contributor

dabla commented May 1, 2024

I know there is still an issue with the MSGraphSensor in that sense that it’s not working correctly in an async way and sometimes an event loop closed error can occur. This PR will fix it so dunno how to proceed for the msgraph part with this RC?

@wlinamchurch
Copy link
Contributor

@eladkal #38911 tested and working correctly.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Contributor

@eladkal #39300 tested and working correctly.

@Anush008
Copy link
Contributor

Anush008 commented May 1, 2024

Provider qdrant: 1.1.0rc1
#39273

Tested. Works as expected.

@dondaum
Copy link
Contributor

dondaum commented May 1, 2024

#38961 is good. ✅

airflow-oss-bot added a commit to astronomer/astronomer-providers that referenced this issue May 2, 2024
@dabla
Copy link
Contributor

dabla commented May 2, 2024

Following 3 PR suffer from the same issues with the MSGraphSenor which has been fixed in #39304:
#38111
#39237
#39207

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented May 2, 2024

I know there is still an issue with the MSGraphSensor in that sense that it’s not working correctly in an async way and sometimes an event loop closed error can occur. This PR will fix it so dunno how to proceed for the msgraph part with this RC?

It's not merged. Only merged PR before release are included.

@dabla
Copy link
Contributor

dabla commented May 2, 2024

I know there is still an issue with the MSGraphSensor in that sense that it’s not working correctly in an async way and sometimes an event loop closed error can occur. This PR will fix it so dunno how to proceed for the msgraph part with this RC?

It's not merged. Only merged PR before release are included.

I know there is still an issue with the MSGraphSensor in that sense that it’s not working correctly in an async way and sometimes an event loop closed error can occur. This PR will fix it so dunno how to proceed for the msgraph part with this RC?

It's not merged. Only merged PR before release are included.

I know Elad I just wanted to make you guys aware of it.

@pankajastro
Copy link
Member

Tested #39279 and #38536 looks good

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented May 2, 2024

I know Elad I just wanted to make you guys aware of it.

If there is regression we can make RC2 then it will be included. What do you recommend ?

@paolo-moriello
Copy link
Contributor

#39325 tested 👍

@Kylea650
Copy link
Contributor

Kylea650 commented May 2, 2024

Anybody with an Azure account able to test #39156? I can provide an example DAG I just don’t have access to my work Azure account right now and don’t want to block the release.

@rawwar
Copy link
Collaborator

rawwar commented May 2, 2024

Pineconepinecone: 2.0.0rc1

PR: #37307 is has bugs.

Fix is being implemented in #39365

@tomrutter
Copy link
Contributor

Happy with #38747

@dabla
Copy link
Contributor

dabla commented May 2, 2024

I know Elad I just wanted to make you guys aware of it.

If there is regression we can make RC2 then it will be included. What do you recommend ?

Yes an RC2 would be great.

@pankajkoti
Copy link
Member

Verified #39178 , works all fine

@boraberke
Copy link
Contributor

#39266 looks good.

@zstrathe
Copy link
Contributor

zstrathe commented May 2, 2024

#38716 tested and verified #38713 is resolved

airflow-oss-bot added a commit to astronomer/astro-sdk that referenced this issue May 3, 2024
@nyoungstudios
Copy link
Contributor

Tested #39139 and looks good!

@Taragolis
Copy link
Contributor

Tests my changes (most of them just cosmetic), look good

@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

Lee-W commented May 6, 2024

for #38912, we might introduce a potential bug as commented in #36090 (comment)

@pankajkoti
Copy link
Member

for #38912, we might introduce a potential bug as commented in #36090 (comment)

Similar risk for #39130 and #39230

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented May 6, 2024

Thank you everyone. Providers are released.
Google, microsoft.azure and pinecone are excluded from this wave.

I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests