Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQUEST] Archival support for metadata table of Record level indexing #11195

Open
bibhu107 opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
feature-enquiry issue contains feature enquiries/requests or great improvement ideas metadata metadata table

Comments

@bibhu107
Copy link

Hi Community,

I am seeking guidance on implementing archival policies for the Metadata table in Hudi's record-level indexing (RLI). We are not concerned with retaining data older than three years, as we move that data from standard S3 storage to Glacier. Additionally, we would like to archive the metadata record keys provided by Hudi's record-level indexing to keep storage costs under control. I wanted to inquire if there are any plans to introduce TTL or Archival support for the Hudi metadata table's record keys. Is there any plan to bring this feature.

Thanks

cc - @codope

@danny0405
Copy link
Contributor

I wanted to inquire if there are any plans to introduce TTL or Archival support for the Hudi metadata table's record keys.

Record level ttl is a very tipical request for regular K-V storage, so as to the RLI.

@danny0405 danny0405 changed the title [SUPPORT] Archival support for metadata table of Record level indexing [FEATURE REQUEST] Archival support for metadata table of Record level indexing May 12, 2024
@danny0405 danny0405 added feature-enquiry issue contains feature enquiries/requests or great improvement ideas metadata metadata table labels May 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-enquiry issue contains feature enquiries/requests or great improvement ideas metadata metadata table
Projects
Status: Awaiting Triage
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants