Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug(Learn):bakcup or dup a table with per disk throttling on a backup-duplication cluster , some nodes coredump #1969

Open
ninsmiracle opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
type/bug This issue reports a bug.

Comments

@ninsmiracle
Copy link
Contributor

ninsmiracle commented Apr 1, 2024

Bug Report

  1. What did you do?
    Firstly , I do all my work in a bakcup-duplication cluster (relatively,mater-duplication cluster send message to it.)
  • When I config max_copy_rate_megabytes_per_disk , Whether I do backup or duplication for an app , some nodes on bakcup-cluster will coredump.And I discovered a phenomenon that they all coredump when secondary replica try to learn from primary replica.

  • Without max_copy_rate_megabytes_per_disk , backup action or duplication action will not casue any coredump.

2.coredump file:

#0  0x00007fa027148c30 in dsn::replication::replica_duplicator_manager::update_duplication_map (this=0x0, new_dup_map=...)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/replica/duplication/replica_duplicator_manager.h:57
57      /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/replica/duplication/replica_duplicator_manager.h: No such file or directory.
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install bzip2-libs-1.0.6-13.el7.x86_64 elfutils-libelf-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 elfutils-libs-0.166-2.el7.x86_64 glibc-2.17-157.el7_3.1.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.5.8-3.el7.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.14.1-27.el7_3.x86_64 libattr-2.4.46-12.el7.x86_64 libcap-2.22-8.el7.x86_64 libcom_err-1.42.9-9.el7.x86_64 libgcc-4.8.5-28.el7_5.1.x86_64 libselinux-2.5-15.el7.x86_64 pcre-8.32-15.el7_2.1.x86_64 systemd-libs-219-67.el7_7.1.x86_64 xz-libs-5.2.2-1.el7.x86_64 zlib-1.2.7-17.el7.x86_64
(gdb) #0  0x00007fa027148c30 in dsn::replication::replica_duplicator_manager::update_duplication_map (this=0x0, new_dup_map=...)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/replica/duplication/replica_duplicator_manager.h:57
#1  0x00007fa027146635 in dsn::replication::duplication_sync_timer::update_duplication_map (this=this@entry=0x407c5f00, dup_map=...)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/replica/duplication/duplication_sync_timer.cpp:111
#2  0x00007fa02714673b in dsn::replication::duplication_sync_timer::on_duplication_sync_reply (this=this@entry=0x407c5f00, err=..., resp=...)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/replica/duplication/duplication_sync_timer.cpp:90
#3  0x00007fa027146825 in operator() (err=..., __closure=0x8f0239e0)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/replica/duplication/duplication_sync_timer.cpp:77
#4  operator() (req=<optimized out>, resp=<optimized out>, err=...,
    __closure=0x8f0239e0)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/include/dsn/cpp/rpc_holder.h:161
#5  std::_Function_handler<void(dsn::error_code, dsn::message_ex*, dsn::message_ex*), dsn::rpc_holder<TRequest, TResponse>::call(const dsn::rpc_address&, dsn::task_tracker*, TCallback&&, int) [with TCallback = dsn::replication::duplication_sync_timer::run()::<lambda(dsn::error_code)>; TRequest = dsn::replication::duplication_sync_request; TResponse = dsn::replication::duplication_sync_response; dsn::task_ptr = dsn::ref_ptr<dsn::task>]::<lambda(dsn::error_code, dsn::message_ex*, dsn::message_ex*)> >::_M_invoke(const std::_Any_data &, dsn::error_code &, dsn::message_ex *&, dsn::message_ex *&) (__functor=..., __args#0=...,
    __args#1=<optimized out>, __args#2=<optimized out>)
    at /opt/rh/devtoolset-7/root/usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:316
#6  0x00007fa0272c06d7 in operator() (__args#2=<optimized out>,
    __args#1=<optimized out>, __args#0=..., this=<optimized out>)
    at /opt/rh/devtoolset-7/root/usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:706
#7  dsn::rpc_response_task::exec (this=<optimized out>)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/include/dsn/tool-api/task.h:478
#8  0x00007fa0272c1431 in dsn::task::exec_internal (
    this=this@entry=0x8d6b2b00)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/runtime/task/task.cpp:176
#9  0x00007fa0272d6ae2 in dsn::task_worker::loop (this=0x2e66e70)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/runtime/task/task_worker.cpp:224
#10 0x00007fa0272d6c60 in dsn::task_worker::run_internal (this=0x2e66e70)
    at /home/work/pegasus/src/rdsn/src/runtime/task/task_worker.cpp:204
#11 0x00007fa025f54a1f in execute_native_thread_routine ()
   from /home/work/app/pegasus/azpnsrv-storecom/replica/package/bin/libdsn_utils.so
#12 0x00007fa023d5fdc5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#13 0x00007fa02225e73d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) quit
  1. What version of Pegasus are you using?
    v2.4
@ninsmiracle ninsmiracle added the type/bug This issue reports a bug. label Apr 1, 2024
@ruojieranyishen
Copy link
Collaborator

ruojieranyishen commented Apr 24, 2024

I found that max_copy_rate_megabytes_per_disk causes group check timeouts, leading to primary replica shard ballot growth. Some nodes are generating core dumps, and in severe cases, unalive nodes will appear.
This issue can be reliably reproduced.

What did you do?

a. Execute command restore -c c4tst-function3 -a lpf_test -i 27 -t 1713285672087 -b hdfs_zjy -r /user/s_pegasus/lpfbackup
b. Execute multiple times server-config replica max_copy_rate_megabytes_per_disk set NUM , NUM = [10,50,10,50,10].

Phenomenon

Many groupcheck timeouts and node core dump. The coredump content is the same as the above coredump file content.

log.2.txt:E2024-04-23 19:08:33.428 (1713870513428314325 9853) replica.replica11.0404000b000003d1: replica_failover.cpp:68:handle_remote_failure(): [31.42@x.x.x.x:45101](mailto:31.42@x.x.x.x:45101): handle remote failure caused by group check, error = ERR_TIMEOUT, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, node = [x.x.x.x:45101](http://x.x.x.x:45101/)
log.2.txt:E2024-04-23 19:09:06.711 (1713870546711168146 9853) replica.replica11.0404000b000003f2: replica_failover.cpp:68:handle_remote_failure(): [31.42@x.x.x.x:45101](mailto:31.42@x.x.x.x:45101): handle remote failure caused by group check, error = ERR_TIMEOUT, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, node = [x.x.x.x:45101](http://x.x.x.x:45101/)
log.2.txt:E2024-04-23 19:10:10.238 (1713870610238377803 9853) replica.replica11.0404000b00000411: replica_failover.cpp:68:handle_remote_failure(): [31.42@x.x.x.x:45101](mailto:31.42@x.x.x.x:45101): handle remote failure caused by group check, error = ERR_TIMEOUT, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, node = [x.x.x.x:45101](http://x.x.x.x:45101/)
log.2.txt:E2024-04-23 19:10:24.219 (1713870624219417888 9845) replica.replica3.04040003000002da: replica_failover.cpp:68:handle_remote_failure(): [31.82@x.x.x.x:45101](mailto:31.82@x.x.x.x:45101): handle remote failure caused by group check, error = ERR_TIMEOUT, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, node = [x.x.x.x:45101](http://x.x.x.x:45101/)
log.2.txt:E2024-04-23 19:10:47.670 (1713870647670827213 9845) replica.replica3.04040003000002e5: replica_failover.cpp:68:handle_remote_failure(): [31.82@x.x.x.x:45101](mailto:31.82@x.x.x.x:45101): handle remote failure caused by group check, error = ERR_TIMEOUT, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, node = [x.x.x.x:45101](http://x.x.x.x:45101/)
log.2.txt:E2024-04-23 19:10:59.988 (1713870659988397675 9847) replica.replica5.0404000500000214: replica_failover.cpp:68:handle_remote_failure(): [31.12@x.x.x.x:45101](mailto:31.12@x.x.x.x:45101): handle remote failure caused by group check, error = ERR_TIMEOUT, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, node = [x.x.x.x:45101](http://x.x.x.x:45101/)
log.2.txt:E2024-04-23 19:10:59.988 (1713870659988935233 9861) replica.replica19.04040013000007cd: replica_failover.cpp:68:handle_remote_failure(): [29.0@x.x.x.x:45101](mailto:29.0@x.x.x.x:45101): handle remote failure caused by group check, error = ERR_TIMEOUT, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, node = [x.x.x.x:45101](http://x.x.x.x:45101/)

Case1

RPC_GROUP_CHECK_ACK is sent with a delay of 9 seconds

primary replica send

D2024-04-23 19:10:02.688 (1713870602688110786 9853) replica.replica11.0404000b00000410: replica_check.cpp:191:call(): rpc_name = RPC_GROUP_CHECK, remote_addr = x.x.x.x:45101, header_format = RPC_GROUP_CHECK, task_id = 289356323303195665, seq_id = 14982, trace_id = 0eb2a9e82c2277de

log.2.txt:D2024-04-23 19:10:02.688 (1713870602688121529 9853) replica.replica11.0404000b00000410: replica_check.cpp:140:broadcast_group_check(): 31.42@x.x.x.x:45101:
send group check to x.x.x.x:45101 with state replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY , task_id 289356323303195665 ,ballot 7

log.2.txt:E2024-04-23 19:10:10.238 (1713870610238377803 9853) replica.replica11.0404000b00000411: replica_failover.cpp:68:handle_remote_failure(): 31.42@x.x.x.x:45101: handle remote failure caused by group check, error = ERR_TIMEOUT, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, node = x.x.x.x:45101

secondary replica reply

log.3.txt:I2024-04-23 19:10:02.688 (1713870602688201671 84230) replica.io-thrd.84230: network.cpp:415:on_recv_message(): LPF rpc_name = RPC_GROUP_CHECK, this_recv_addr = x.x.x.x:64140, header_format = NET_HDR_DSN, seq_id = 14982, trace_id = 0eb2a9e82c2277de

D2024-04-23 19:10:02.688 (1713870602688281016 84284) replica.replica11.04004906000108f0: replica_stub.cpp:1215:on_group_check(): 31.42@x.x.x.x:45101: received group check, primary = x.x.x.x:45101, ballot = 7, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, last_committed_decree = 200457

D2024-04-23 19:10:02.688 (1713870602688323625 84284) replica.replica11.04004906000108f0: replica_check.cpp:164:on_group_check(): [31.42@x.x.x.x:45101] process group check, primary = x.x.x.x:45101, ballot = 7, status = replication::partition_status::PS_SECONDARY, last_committed_decree = 200457, confirmed_decree = -1

log.3.txt:I2024-04-23 19:10:11.198 (1713870611198691041 84284) replica.replica11.04004906000108f0: rpc_engine.cpp:742:reply(): LPF response rpc_name = RPC_GROUP_CHECK_ACK, from_addr = x.x.x.x:45101, to_addr = x.x.x.x:45101, header_format = NET_HDR_DSN, seq_id = 14982, trace_id = 0eb2a9e82c2277de

Reason

I suspect that the sleep_for function is causing the replica.default thread pool to sleep excessively, affecting the sending of RPC_GROUP_CHECK_ACK. However, it is still unclear how this is happening.

    bool consumeWithBorrowAndWait(double toConsume,
                                  double rate,
                                  double burstSize,
                                  double nowInSeconds = defaultClockNow())
    {
        auto res = consumeWithBorrowNonBlocking(toConsume, rate, burstSize, nowInSeconds);
        if (res.get_value_or(0) > 0) {
            int64_t napUSec = res.get() * 1000000;
            std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::microseconds(napUSec));
        }
        return res.is_initialized();
    }

When max_copy_rate_megabytes_per_disk is set 10, Seconds-level sleep is causing the replica.default thread pool to sleep excessively.

2024-04-23 19:10:02.341 84238) replica.default1.040100070000298f: sleep,microseconds is 3199715,
D2024-04-23 19:10:02.343 84239) replica.default2.0401000700002993: sleep,microseconds is 3598415,
D2024-04-23 19:10:02.440 84241) replica.default4.0401000700002999: sleep,microseconds is 3901018,
D2024-04-23 19:10:02.712 84243) replica.default6.040100080000296b: sleep,microseconds is 4029154,
D2024-04-23 19:10:02.714 84245) replica.default8.0401000700002995: sleep,microseconds is 4427141,
D2024-04-23 19:10:02.744 84242) replica.default5.0401000700002997: sleep,microseconds is 4797563,
D2024-04-23 19:10:03.144 84237) replica.default0.0401000800002969: sleep,microseconds is 4797490,
D2024-04-23 19:10:03.544 84240) replica.default3.0401000200001e72: sleep,microseconds is 4797061,
D2024-04-23 19:10:03.943 84247) replica.default10.0401000a00002990: sleep,microseconds is 4798536,
D2024-04-23 19:10:04.343 84244) replica.default7.040100070000299b: sleep,microseconds is 4798140,
D2024-04-23 19:10:04.746 84246) replica.default9.04010001000024e5: sleep,microseconds is 4795031,
D2024-04-23 19:10:05.142 84248) replica.default11.0401000600001f65: sleep,microseconds is 372727,
D2024-04-23 19:10:05.515 84248) replica.default11.0401000600001f65: sleep,microseconds is 377530,
D2024-04-23 19:10:05.542 84238) replica.default1.0401000200001e74: sleep,microseconds is 4399154,
D2024-04-23 19:10:05.904 84248) replica.default11.0401000b00002296: sleep,microseconds is 4093229,
D2024-04-23 19:10:06.75 84239) replica.default2.040100040000260e: sleep,microseconds is 217558,
D2024-04-23 19:10:06.294 84239) replica.default2.0401000900002654: sleep,microseconds is 4103047,
D2024-04-23 19:10:06.358 84241) replica.default4.0401000600001f73: sleep,microseconds is 334393,
D2024-04-23 19:10:06.693 84241) replica.default4.040100080000296f: sleep,microseconds is 399535,
D2024-04-23 19:10:06.745 84243) replica.default6.040100080000296d: sleep,microseconds is 747141,
D2024-04-23 19:10:07.93 84241) replica.default4.040100050000229c: sleep,microseconds is 799505,
D2024-04-23 19:10:07.142 84245) replica.default8.040100050000229a: sleep,microseconds is 3655019,
D2024-04-23 19:10:07.493 84243) replica.default6.04010000000026db: sleep,microseconds is 799331,
D2024-04-23 19:10:07.542 84242) replica.default5.04010000000026d9: sleep,microseconds is 3255109,
D2024-04-23 19:10:07.895 84241) replica.default4.0401000300002787: sleep,microseconds is 2901920,
D2024-04-23 19:10:07.944 84237) replica.default0.0401000300002789: sleep,microseconds is 748869,
D2024-04-23 19:10:08.294 84243) replica.default6.040100030000278b: sleep,microseconds is 798618,
D2024-04-23 19:10:08.344 84240) replica.default3.0401000a00002992: sleep,microseconds is 2853312,
D2024-04-23 19:10:08.695 84237) replica.default0.0401000a00002994: sleep,microseconds is 797321,
D2024-04-23 19:10:08.743 84247) replica.default10.040100070000299d: sleep,microseconds is 3254699,
D2024-04-23 19:10:09.94 84243) replica.default6.0401000900002660: sleep,microseconds is 3702864,
D2024-04-23 19:10:09.142 84244) replica.default7.0401000900002662: sleep,microseconds is 1150250,
D2024-04-23 19:10:09.493 84237) replica.default0.0401000b0000229a: sleep,microseconds is 799877,
D2024-04-23 19:10:09.541 84246) replica.default9.0401000b0000229c: sleep,microseconds is 751294,
D2024-04-23 19:10:09.944 84238) replica.default1.0401000b0000229e: sleep,microseconds is 348727,

@ruojieranyishen
Copy link
Collaborator

ruojieranyishen commented May 9, 2024

max_copy_rate_megabytes_per_disk causes a large number of threads in the replica.default thread pool to sleep. The nfs_service_impl::on_copy working on replica.default can also cause this issue.

In this thread pool:

  1. affecting the timely processing of remote_command. For example:

    >>> server_info -r
    COMMAND: server-info
    
    CALL [meta-server] [xxxx:45001] succeed: Pegasus Server 2.4.3-without-slog (84632317ee48b2c6c013f41d0e6f73ad4955b6bb) Release, Started at 2024-03-22 14:10:53
    CALL [meta-server] [xxxx:45001] succeed: Pegasus Server 2.4.3-without-slog (84632317ee48b2c6c013f41d0e6f73ad4955b6bb) Release, Started at 2024-03-22 14:11:01
    CALL [replica-server] [xxxx:45101] succeed: Pegasus Server 2.4.3-without-slog (84632317ee48b2c6c013f41d0e6f73ad4955b6bb) Release, Started at 2024-03-22 14:11:15
    CALL [replica-server] [xxxx:45101] failed: ERR_TIMEOUT
    CALL [replica-server] [xxxx:45101] succeed: Pegasus Server 2.4.3-without-slog (84632317ee48b2c6c013f41d0e6f73ad4955b6bb) Release, Started at 2024-04-15 17:50:28
    CALL [replica-server] [xxxx:45101] failed: ERR_TIMEOUT
    CALL [replica-server] [xxxx:45101] succeed: Pegasus Server 2.4.3-without-slog (84632317ee48b2c6c013f41d0e6f73ad4955b6bb) Release, Started at 2024-03-22 14:11:22
    
    Succeed count: 5
    Failed count: 2
    
  2. Some RPCs are being delayed for transmission. For example:

    RPC_CM_CONFIG_SYNC
    RPC_CM_DUPLICATION_SYNC
    RPC_NFS_COPY
    

    May be related: Bug(duplication):some nodes can not send duplication data in master when big difference in data size #1840

  3. Indirectly makes the Group Check ERR_TIMEOUT in replica.replica and causes ballot increase.

[general]
app_name           : lpf_test
app_id             : 46      
partition_count    : 100     
max_replica_count  : 3       
[replicas]
pidx  ballot  replica_count  primary              secondaries                             
0     6       3/3            x.x.x.x:55101  [x.x.x.x:55101,x.x.x.x:55101]   
1     7       3/3            x.x.x.x:55101  [x.x.x.x:55101,x.x.x.x:55101] 
2     5       3/3            x.x.x.x:55101  [x.x.x.x:55101,x.x.x.x:55101] 
3     9       3/3            x.x.x.x:55101  [x.x.x.x:55101,x.x.x.x:55101] 
4     5       3/3            x.x.x.x:55101   [x.x.x.x:55101,x.x.x.x:55101] 
5     6       3/3            x.x.x.x:55101   [x.x.x.x:55101,x.x.x.x:55101] 
6     7       3/3            x.x.x.x:55101  [x.x.x.x:55101,x.x.x.x:55101] 

Solution

  1. If the max_copy_rate_megabytes_per_disk is not set too low and not frequently adjusted, it is unlikely to trigger the problem.

  2. Or replace the default RPC thread pool for NFS-related operations in nfs_server_impl.cpp can resolves this issue. For example:

-DEFINE_TASK_CODE_RPC(RPC_NFS_COPY, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, ::dsn::THREAD_POOL_DEFAULT)
+DEFINE_TASK_CODE_RPC(RPC_NFS_COPY, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, ::dsn::THREAD_POOL_LEARN)
 DEFINE_TASK_CODE_RPC(RPC_NFS_GET_FILE_SIZE, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, ::dsn::THREAD_POOL_DEFAULT)
 // test timer task code
 DEFINE_TASK_CODE(LPC_NFS_REQUEST_TIMER, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, ::dsn::THREAD_POOL_DEFAULT)
 
-DEFINE_TASK_CODE_AIO(LPC_NFS_READ, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, THREAD_POOL_DEFAULT)
+DEFINE_TASK_CODE_AIO(LPC_NFS_READ, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, ::dsn::THREAD_POOL_LEARN)
 
-DEFINE_TASK_CODE_AIO(LPC_NFS_WRITE, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, THREAD_POOL_DEFAULT)
+DEFINE_TASK_CODE_AIO(LPC_NFS_WRITE, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, ::dsn::THREAD_POOL_LEARN)
 
-DEFINE_TASK_CODE_AIO(LPC_NFS_COPY_FILE, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, THREAD_POOL_DEFAULT)
+DEFINE_TASK_CODE_AIO(LPC_NFS_COPY_FILE, TASK_PRIORITY_COMMON, ::dsn::THREAD_POOL_LEARN)

Changing the thread pool solve the above problem, but it is unclear whether there are other risks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/bug This issue reports a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants