You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I got this idea from qddcswitch, please take a look at the screenshots over there.
The idea is to have an alternative implementation of non-continuous values. Instead of a drop-down selection box (that requires two clicks, and some precision), we could have multiple buttons side-by-side (requiring just one click). So, instead of this:
Why a horizontal row instead of a vertical row? After all, that would be extensible since everyone's used to sidebars with scrollbars.
I may have considered it, I can't recall. Probably I went with horizontal because it's very easy to automate the layout. To do vertical sliders I would probably have to have code to place sliders vertically and then separately place combo boxes elsewhere. If I didn't separately place the combo-boxes, things could get very wide. At the moment the layout is a simple evenly spaced QVBoxLayout.
Just for fun, I just now flipped some of the layout settings to vertical. As you can see, a simple/single left-right layout for all the controls and labels isn't pretty, so moving to vertical sliders would require a more complicated set of layouts and layout algorithms:
Which is not to say it couldn't be done. But it's already 7000 lines of script.
I got this idea from qddcswitch, please take a look at the screenshots over there.
The idea is to have an alternative implementation of non-continuous values. Instead of a drop-down selection box (that requires two clicks, and some precision), we could have multiple buttons side-by-side (requiring just one click). So, instead of this:
We could have this:
This of course doesn't make sense if the amount of options is too high.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: