Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optionally indicate that a trigger should run in its own query #7335

Open
mfenn opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Optionally indicate that a trigger should run in its own query #7335

mfenn opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@mfenn
Copy link

mfenn commented May 10, 2024

Reference this thread in Discord: https://discord.com/channels/841451783728529451/849377751370432573/1237909891641770085

and this (closed) issue: #7334

We have an object that, when updated, we want to trigger some changes on another object. We had two triggers to do this updating because each had differing and somewhat complex when logic. When we updated the first object only one of the updates on the second would take place.

Since it sounds like this is intentional/known functionality, I'd like to propose a way to indicate that a trigger should run in its own query (but still in the same transaction). This would allow us to create simpler easier-to-understand triggers instead of trying to stuff a bunch of logic in one mega trigger.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants