Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] default rule naming and columns #1121

Open
atomGit opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature Request] default rule naming and columns #1121

atomGit opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
feature a whole new feature

Comments

@atomGit
Copy link

atomGit commented Apr 28, 2024

i'd like to propose that the default rule name format be reconsidered

using audacious as an example, a default rule name might look like:
allow-always-list-usr-bin-audacious-123-123-123-123-9999-1000

i think both the action and duration can be eliminated from the rule name given that there's already columns in the UI for these items

i would also propose that the UID (and the port potentially) be removed and columns added in the UI to hold these items

lastly, i'd prefer to discard the hyphens in addresses and use the actual address - so now the above rule becomes much shorter and more readable...

name | direction | address
audacious > *
-or-
audacious > 123.123.123.123
-or-
audacious > 123.123.123.123:9999

perhaps hovering or selecting a rule would display a pop-up that would reveal more detail, like the full command, or perhaps another column(s) could be added in the UI

i wonder if auto-grouping could also be done here - for example, if a rule for firefox is created ([100] firefox > example.com) and then another rule is created, maybe opensnitch could see that a previous rule for that command exists and give it the same group id ([100] firefox > example.com:22)

related: [Feature Request] Rule Groups · Issue #1078 · evilsocket/opensnitch

@atomGit atomGit added the feature a whole new feature label Apr 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature a whole new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant