Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for providing a model configuration file for inference services #249

Open
flaviodsr opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
area/core area/extension FuseML extensions for 3rd party tool integration enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@flaviodsr
Copy link
Member

Some inference services (e.g. Triton) requires a configuration file to be able to serve a model. In the case of triton a minimal model configuration must specify the platform and/or backend properties, the max_batch_size property, and the input and output tensors of the model (see: https://github.com/triton-inference-server/server/blob/main/docs/model_configuration.md).

There is also the case where the configuration file is optional, for example the sklearn predictor in kfserving (see: https://github.com/kserve/kserve/tree/master/docs/samples/v1beta1/sklearn/v2#model-settings), which is used for specifying some meta-data about the model (name, version, ...)

Currently FuseML does not have a mechanism for providing such configuration file, which makes it unable to support some inference service solutions, for example using Triton to serve a pytorch model.

@flaviodsr flaviodsr added enhancement New feature or request area/core area/extension FuseML extensions for 3rd party tool integration labels Sep 27, 2021
@stefannica stefannica added this to Backlog in FuseML Project Board via automation Sep 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/core area/extension FuseML extensions for 3rd party tool integration enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant