Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ Feature ] Summary chart with Geometric mean #352

Open
omar391 opened this issue Jan 7, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

[ Feature ] Summary chart with Geometric mean #352

omar391 opened this issue Jan 7, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@omar391
Copy link

omar391 commented Jan 7, 2023

Is there any plan to implement a feature like this, this would be highly helpful:

https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/box-plot-summary-charts.html

Ref:

@hanabi1224
Copy link
Owner

I'm not sure how to represent certain facts with such charts, e.g.
nbody/2.py is faster than nbody/1.py with pypy (with JIT) but is slower with python (no JIT), any combination of program selections to represent pypy and python can be misleading in some way, I would only analyze the numbers by reading the source code myself, instead of looking at a chart

@omar391
Copy link
Author

omar391 commented Jan 12, 2023

hmm..

But, I think we can solve this by considering them as a group just like we have execution matrix in the Github action CI. i.e.

  1. python-pypy
  2. python-python3
  3. go-golang-official
  4. go-tinygo
  5. javascript-typescript
  6. javascript-vanila
  7. wasm-wasm3
  8. wasm-chorme
    etc.

Then we can do the geometric mean with box-plot on these datasets. This way we see the performance of of a language and it specific compiler/interprert set.

@igouy
Copy link

igouy commented Apr 14, 2023

I would only analyze the numbers by reading the source code myself, instead of looking at a chart

Have you tried to do that? Can you tell us how the Nim programs compare to the Zig programs, or how the Ruby programs compare to the Python programs?

There's an English idiom which describes this situation — "can't see the forest for the trees"

A summary is always less-complete than the detail but we accept that because there can be too much detail to comprehend in the time we have available.

@igouy
Copy link

igouy commented Apr 14, 2023

There doesn't seem to be a way to download a file containing all the measurements?

That kind of data file would make it easier for people to do their own analysis and charts (although they probably won't).

@hakanai
Copy link

hakanai commented Jan 16, 2024

Wouldn't it be nice if you were on the Nim vs Zig page and instead of it being a bunch of numbers, it was actually colourful charts, so you could feel which team was winning by just looking at the page instead of spending an hour reading it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants