Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fall back to synchronous preprocessors #506

Open
chriseppstein opened this issue Sep 16, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Fall back to synchronous preprocessors #506

chriseppstein opened this issue Sep 16, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@chriseppstein
Copy link
Contributor

If a syntax is missing in preprocessors but is present in preprocessorsSync, we should fall back to using the synchronous implementation instead of erroring out.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@chriseppstein