You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Which topic needs more explanation?
In figure 8-9, channel balances between Alice/Bob, Bob/Chan, and Chan/Dina are already updated to include the 50k sat payment from Alice to Dina. Is this correct? My understanding is that, at this stage, all that's happened is that Alice, Bob and Chan have locked up sats into HTLCs--which should indeed update their local balances (since the locked up sats are taken out of outbound liquidity until the HTCLs settle). However, those locked up sats shouldn't be included in the remote balances just yet, correct? This means that Bob's inbound liquidity should still be 70k, Chan's inbound liquidity should still be 4mil, and Dina's inbound liquidity should still be 50k. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
In figure 8-10, following from the above, Bob's inbound liquidity should still be 70k, and Chan's inbound liquidity should still be 4mil.
Finally, in figure 8-11, following from the above, Bob's inbound liquidity should still be 70k.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Which topic needs more explanation?
In figure 8-9, channel balances between Alice/Bob, Bob/Chan, and Chan/Dina are already updated to include the 50k sat payment from Alice to Dina. Is this correct? My understanding is that, at this stage, all that's happened is that Alice, Bob and Chan have locked up sats into HTLCs--which should indeed update their local balances (since the locked up sats are taken out of outbound liquidity until the HTCLs settle). However, those locked up sats shouldn't be included in the remote balances just yet, correct? This means that Bob's inbound liquidity should still be 70k, Chan's inbound liquidity should still be 4mil, and Dina's inbound liquidity should still be 50k. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
In figure 8-10, following from the above, Bob's inbound liquidity should still be 70k, and Chan's inbound liquidity should still be 4mil.
Finally, in figure 8-11, following from the above, Bob's inbound liquidity should still be 70k.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: