Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gas fees on ZK/Portal bridge too high #1219

Open
beebeehem opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Gas fees on ZK/Portal bridge too high #1219

beebeehem opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@beebeehem
Copy link

馃専 Feature Request

Work on reducing gas fees while bridging from Ethereum to ZKSync using the official bridge.

It costs about $35 currently to bridge ETH from the official bridge to ZKsync. That's 7-10x higher than third party bridges

馃 Rationale

The high gas fees will deter users from using the official bridge, hence finding alternatives.

@0xSimeon
Copy link

All official bridges have high gas costs. I don't think it is a zksync centric problem.

@brianoy
Copy link

brianoy commented Feb 27, 2024

All operations on the mainnet now require high amounts of gas (ETH). The issue you should raise is to recommend matterlab to build a multi-chain official bridge and not just use the mainnet as the only official bridge.
You can use orbiter.finance, which does not rely on smart contracts, so it does not need to consume too much gas. Each cross-chain transfer activity is only considered one transaction. It costs about 11 usd from the mainnet to the zksync era chain, and it costs about 3 usd from linea to the zksync era chain. In fect, you can directly use binance to transfer ETH to the zksync era chain, which costs about 1 usd.

@ScapeXYZ
Copy link

ScapeXYZ commented Mar 1, 2024

Good one

@EmilLuta
Copy link
Contributor

@vladbochok is this something we can look into?

@ifarhoo20
Copy link

agree and resolve :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants