New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for Fedora 40 with rocm #3877
Comments
We do have code to try to detect a pre-existing ROCm install. From your description, I take it this logic isn't working on your system, correct? Where is ROCm actually installed? |
Yes, I've used the installer to figure out where it's looking for stuff. Fedora 40 include ROCm now in standard locations as far as I can tell. So the paths used are not useful. I'm not sure, but I guess it would never look inside I'm seeing this:
|
It looks like the install script is looking for
EDIT: For what it's worth this seems to work for me:
|
I have the new fedora 40 rocm packages installed
Systemd service
logs
thank you for your help |
@jontyms try setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include the directory. HIP_PATH typically points to the root of the ROCm install, with ./bin/ and ./lib/ subdirectories. We can probably refine our search algo to try with and without adding lib to support this better, but you should be able to get it working with LD_LIBRARY_PATH. @oatmealm thanks for those paths. Where are the rocblas files installed? (e.g., |
|
It can be found there AFTER one learns to do See https://github.com/vorburger/vorburger.ch-Notes/blob/develop/ml/ollama1.md for context. #4527 raised to suggest adding this to documentation. |
Since F40 has rocm6 now, it'd be useful if it can be picked up. I have this to block the installer from downloading the libararies:
Though I do see problems with support for
gfx900
which I can't avoid withHSA_OVERRIDE_GFX_VERSION=9.0.0
...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: