Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[enhancement] Adding an option to perform an NTLMv1 scan #67

Open
AdrianVollmer opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[enhancement] Adding an option to perform an NTLMv1 scan #67

AdrianVollmer opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@AdrianVollmer
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I like coercer a lot, in particular for identifying DCs which have NTLMv1 enabled. What I always do is run responder in analyze mode and then coercer in coerce mode to see if I get NTLMv1 hashes.

Unfortunately, this doesn't scale well. In some cases there are 50 DCs and finding the one that has NTLMv1 enabled takes quite a long time, because I cannot automatically tell coercer to stop after receiving one SMB connection.

Would you be interested in bringing this feature to coercer? I'd be open to contributing a PR if you tell me a rough outline of what it should look like. Maybe add a --ntlmv1 flag to the scan subcommand?

It would make sense to use the code from responder, but unfortunately the project isn't packaged, so we cannot import it. We could include it as a git submodule, but then you wouldn't be able to package it. We could also just copy the code, but since responder is GPL licensed, coercer would also need to be GPL licensed. I don't see any license information for coercer yet, so this doesn't seem like a deal breaker.

What do you think?

@p0dalirius p0dalirius changed the title Possible enhancement: NTLMv1 scan [enhancement] Adding an option to perform an NTLMv1 scan Dec 24, 2023
@p0dalirius p0dalirius self-assigned this Dec 24, 2023
@p0dalirius p0dalirius added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants