You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now the profile list is just a list sorted alphabetically. The only way to group profiles is to rename them by adding prefixes. But this is still a flat list.
When there are quite a lot of connection profiles, it is difficult to find and connect to it.
What is the current bug behavior?
It's not a bug
What is the expected correct behavior?
It is proposed to add to the list of directory profiles. Or create them as a separate entity and then include profiles in it. Or specify directories in the profile name, for example:
folder1/profile
folder1/profile2
folder2/profile
And accordingly, display them in the profile list as a tree hierarchy, as file trees are displayed in a regular file system.
Relevant logs and/or screenshots
There is no screenshot
Possible fixes suggested remediation
There is no fix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
Steps to reproduce
Now the profile list is just a list sorted alphabetically. The only way to group profiles is to rename them by adding prefixes. But this is still a flat list.
When there are quite a lot of connection profiles, it is difficult to find and connect to it.
What is the current bug behavior?
It's not a bug
What is the expected correct behavior?
It is proposed to add to the list of directory profiles. Or create them as a separate entity and then include profiles in it. Or specify directories in the profile name, for example:
And accordingly, display them in the profile list as a tree hierarchy, as file trees are displayed in a regular file system.
Relevant logs and/or screenshots
There is no screenshot
Possible fixes suggested remediation
There is no fix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: