Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compare/contrast and migration steps to react_on_rails #1289

Open
justin808 opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

compare/contrast and migration steps to react_on_rails #1289

justin808 opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@justin808
Copy link
Collaborator

justin808 commented Jul 14, 2023

  1. Create a detailed compare/contrast of react_on_rails vs react-rails.
  2. Create clear migration steps both from sprockets and webpacker/shakapacker

Provide clear repo examples of before/after.

@justin808 justin808 changed the title compare/contrast and migration steps compare/contrast and migration steps to react_on_rails Jul 14, 2023
@ahangarha
Copy link
Collaborator

ahangarha commented Aug 29, 2023

Todo

@justin808
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ahangarha we should break up the README and have a /docs folder

And not "Why to migrate?" but "Why migrate".

Use Grammarly!

@paul-mesnilgrente
Copy link

paul-mesnilgrente commented Sep 21, 2023

You haven't mentioned what parts aren't free in react-on-rails, it seems to be a very important distinction to make a decision.

@justin808
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@paul-mesnilgrente agree!

@ahangarha
Copy link
Collaborator

ahangarha commented Oct 5, 2023

We should break up the README and have a /docs folder

It is done.

You haven't mentioned what parts aren't free in react-on-rails, it seems to be a very important distinction to make a decision.

True. But all of the mentioned features are provided by react_on_rails and demonstrated in the react-webpack-rails-tutorial project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants