Don't see any performance difference between Redisson RLocalCachedMap & RMAP

[rakeshupadhyay323]

I am on Redisson version 3.29.0.
I am trying to configure RLocalCachedMap for local reads for the caches that are read heavy.
What I can see is that the time taken by RLocalCachedMap is more or less same as RMap, for multiple reads of same key.

Get is done using: RLocalCachedMap.get(key)

Puts are done using RMap.put(key, value) or RLocalCachedMap.put(key, value) APIs.

RLocalCachedMap is get as:

• redis.getLocalCachedMap(LocalCachedMapOptions.name(cache));
• redis.getLocalCachedMap(LocalCachedMapOptions.name(cache) .cacheSize(100).evictionPolicy(EvictionPolicy.LRU).maxIdle(Duration.ZERO).syncStrategy(SyncStrategy.INVALIDATE).timeToLive(Duration.ZERO).reconnectionStrategy(ReconnectionStrategy.CLEAR));

What I believe is that RLocalCachedMap is making network calls every time and not returning anything from local Cache.

Kindly help in suggesting if there is anything wrong or anything that should be done.
We are working on a POC to see if Redisson meets all the Caching needs and a decision will be made based on this.
I have attached the sample code below.

MainClass.java.txt

[mrniko]

RLocalCachedMap isn't compatible with RMap object. You need to use RLocalCachedMap for put operations.

[rakeshupadhyay323]

I figured it out. There was a problem in code, I was calling map.destroy() after each invocation. This was causing the issue. It is resolved now.