Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

that 3+0 trigger name is horrible #6459

Open
rusefillc opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

that 3+0 trigger name is horrible #6459

rusefillc opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor

@ElDominio should it be "3+0 symmetrical" or "3+0 unsynchronized" or what? Same story for 6+0.

@ElDominio
Copy link
Collaborator

How about "Symmetrical 3 tooth"?

And, why can't this kind of setup be detected using "Custom toothed wheel"

If there are no missing teeth, and ignition is not "single coil", assume we NEED VVT position and do not run until synchronized. I think that would be much more useable?

@rusefillc
Copy link
Contributor Author

#define operation_mode_e_FOUR_STROKE_CAM_SENSOR 2
#define operation_mode_e_FOUR_STROKE_CRANK_SENSOR 1
#define operation_mode_e_FOUR_STROKE_SIX_TIMES_CRANK_SENSOR 7
#define operation_mode_e_FOUR_STROKE_SYMMETRICAL_CRANK_SENSOR 4
#define operation_mode_e_FOUR_STROKE_THREE_TIMES_CRANK_SENSOR 5
#define operation_mode_e_FOUR_STROKE_TWELVE_TIMES_CRANK_SENSOR 6

See moon landing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants