why not provide deep copy method,be like deep copy of array or object?

[yyqxjwxy]

No description provided.

[shtse8]

Deep cloning objects and arrays can indeed get quite complex, especially when you consider all the potential edge cases like nested structures and special types (like Date, RegExp). The aim of Radash is to keep things simple and efficient, focusing on the most common use cases.

Adding a deep copy feature would significantly increase the complexity and size of the library. That’s why it’s left out, allowing users to integrate or implement their own solutions for specific needs. There are dedicated libraries out there that handle deep cloning well, which might be worth looking into for more complex requirements.

I hope this makes sense and aligns with your expectations for using Radash.

[qingzhoufeihu]

Now the packaging tools all have tree shaking functions, if the developer does not reference the deep copy function, it will not be packaged into the final bundle, so there is no need to consider the package size.

[troy351]

Maybe structuredClone ?

[qingzhoufeihu]

We could use immer instead

[Gemini-0529]

Now the packaging tools all have tree shaking functions, if the developer does not reference the deep copy function, it will not be packaged into the final bundle, so there is no need to consider the package size.

日常需求感觉JSON.parse JSON.stringify就够了