Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate bats as a replacement for shunit2 #107

Open
calebcartwright opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Evaluate bats as a replacement for shunit2 #107

calebcartwright opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@calebcartwright
Copy link
Member

The git hook script files are one of the three core pillars that make rusty-hook work, and as such they are unit tested pretty thoroughly. The tests are currently leveraging shunit2 which is certainly sufficient, though I think it may be worth investigating whether we could leverage bats instead.

This is a relatively low priority but opening to keep track

@calebcartwright
Copy link
Member Author

Have been using Bats in other projects and loving it. It will require the incorporation of submodules to pull in things like the assertion library, and I've not had a chance to play with Bats on Windows, but definitely want to pursue this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant