Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flatpak: App Listing Quality improvements #477

Open
JavkhlanK opened this issue Mar 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Flatpak: App Listing Quality improvements #477

JavkhlanK opened this issue Mar 9, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@JavkhlanK
Copy link
Contributor

Flathub recently added guidelines for app listing quality. Currently, the app is failing 5 checks:
Screenshot 2024-03-09 at 19-10-27 Install Galaxy Buds Client on Linux Flathub

Links of failing checks:

I'm not too sure what to do in the brand colors case, but for the others I propose the following metainfo changes:

  • maybe change the app name to "Galaxy Buds Manager" like in the app toolbar
  • maybe change the summary to "Manage any Samsung Galaxy Buds device" (or remove Samsung if 35 characters is a hard guideline)
    • and since the first paragraph of the description is very similar to the summary, remove it

Also, since we're at it, the <developer_name> tag in the metainfo file should be replaced with a <developer> one, since the current one was deprecated. How about something like this:

<developer id="me.timschneeberger">
  <name>Tim Schneeberger</name>
</developer>

Lastly, just as a request, before a new release gets created, please add it to the metainfo file. That way it'd show up nicely in software update apps :)

timschneeb added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2024
@timschneeb
Copy link
Owner

Most should be fixed now: dd5ce6b

@JavkhlanK
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alright, I created a release of 4.6.0 on Flathub and requested another review of the metadata.

@JavkhlanK
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay, fixed! Unfortunately there's new issues:

image

I'm not sure what to do about the trademarks stuff, but the last 2 issues about screenshots are definitely false-positives.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants