Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Where can I find 701 labels file? #111

Open
4 tasks done
OrkhanHI opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 5 comments
Open
4 tasks done

Where can I find 701 labels file? #111

OrkhanHI opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@OrkhanHI
Copy link

Before Asking

  • I have read the README carefully. 我已经仔细阅读了README上的操作指引。

  • I want to train my custom dataset, and I have read the tutorials for finetune on your data carefully and organize my dataset correctly; 我想训练自定义数据集,我已经仔细阅读了训练自定义数据的教程,以及按照正确的目录结构存放数据集。

  • I have pulled the latest code of main branch to run again and the problem still existed. 我已经拉取了主分支上最新的代码,重新运行之后,问题仍不能解决。

Search before asking

  • I have searched the DAMO-YOLO issues and found no similar questions.

Question

I am trying to use inference on the pretrained model with 701 categories. Could you please share the file with 701 labels?

Thanks in advance.

Additional

No response

@OrkhanHI OrkhanHI added the question Further information is requested label May 26, 2023
@aitangbodan
Copy link

hello, I also need 702 labels, thank you !

@LeonNerd
Copy link

hi,感谢开源预训练模型,我也需要相关的类别标签,感谢!大数据集下的backbone对于下游任务的微调,具有更好的鲁棒性能,对于误检的抑制效果很好,

@jie311
Copy link

jie311 commented Jun 25, 2023

hi,感谢开源预训练模型,我也需要相关的类别标签,感谢!大数据集下的backbone对于下游任务的微调,具有更好的鲁棒性能,对于误检的抑制效果很好,

请问您还有700类这个模型的pth吗,readme提供的链接无法下载

@LeonNerd
Copy link

LeonNerd commented Jul 27, 2023 via email

@jzx-gooner
Copy link

Same question:Where can I find 701 labels file?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants