Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[QUESTION] Unexpected results by GPT-SelfInstruct+SuperNI #10

Open
agademic opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[QUESTION] Unexpected results by GPT-SelfInstruct+SuperNI #10

agademic opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@agademic
Copy link

As I understood figure 5 in your paper, you further fine-tuned GPT-SelfInstruct on the SuperNatural Instructions data and surprisingly the results got worse compared to the "vanilla" GPT-SelfInstruct.

Is my understanding correct? If so, do you have any assumptions why a high-quality human annotated dataset as additional fine-tuning data worsened the overall performance?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@agademic