Partially resolve invalid escape sequences (W605)
#39253
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Taragolis
added
the
changelog:skip
Taragolis
requested review from
potiuk,
ashb,
eladkal and
o-nikolas
as code owners
boring-cyborg
bot
added
area:core-operators
vincbeck
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2024
potiuk
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2024
RodrigoGanancia
pushed a commit
to RodrigoGanancia/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recent changes in warnings capture shows that we use deprecated escape sequences, for avoid it we might want to turn it on
W605rule, this one is autofixableFortunately all violation of this rule happen in tests or dev except one case, which is not covered by this PR, see: #39252
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.