[improve][pip] PIP-352: Event time based topic compactor

[marekczajkowski]

PIP: 352

Motivation

Currently, there are two types of compactors
available: TwoPhaseCompactor and StrategicTwoPhaseCompactor. The latter
is specifically utilized for internal load balancing purposes and is not
employed for regular compaction of Pulsar topics. On the other hand, the
former can be configured via CompactionServiceFactory in the
broker.conf.

I believe it could be advantageous to introduce another type of topic
compactor that operates based on event time. Such a compactor would have
the capability to maintain desired messages within the topic while
preserving the order expected by external applications. Although
applications may send messages with the current event time, variations in
network conditions or redeliveries could result in messages being stored in
the Pulsar topic in a different order than intended. Implementing event
time-based checks could mitigate this inconvenience.

Modifications

Added PIP

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

• Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
• Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
• The public API
• The schema
• The default values of configurations
• The threading model
• The binary protocol
• The REST endpoints
• The admin CLI options
• The metrics
• Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

[lhotari]

Added a comment about an unsolved challenge: #22517 (comment)

[marekczajkowski]

@lhotari what are the next steps to proceed ?