-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added get to job type command #4008
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Important Review SkippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Leo for your awesome contribution. Just some minor comments
func NewGetCmd() *cobra.Command { | ||
OG := NewGetOptions() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What would be great is if we can have the existing get
command call this new implementation to avoid duplicating code. Similar to how we are handling bacalhau logs
and bacalhau job logs
https://github.com/bacalhau-project/bacalhau/blob/main/cmd/cli/logs/logs.go
I would also move the tests to this package as our goal is to eventually deprecate bacalhau get
and only keep bacalhau job get
cmd/util/printer/print_legacy.go
Outdated
cmd.Printf("\nTo download the results, execute:\n\t"+os.Args[0]+" job get %s\n", j.ID()) | ||
} | ||
|
||
if !quiet { | ||
cmd.Printf("\nTo get more details about the run, execute:\n\t"+os.Args[0]+" describe %s\n", j.ID()) | ||
cmd.Printf("\nTo get more details about the run, execute:\n\t"+os.Args[0]+" job describe %s\n", j.ID()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we still want the legacy commands to refer to the legacy get
and describe
commands as bacalhau describe
's output is different than bacalhau job describe
Can you check now, I have removed the duplicate code. |
PR contains
bacalhau get
tobacalhau job get
#3971