Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CLN] Improve JS client async errors tests #2135

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ibratoev
Copy link
Contributor

@ibratoev ibratoev commented May 4, 2024

Use the jest standard Jest way for testing for rejected promises: await expect(...).rejects.throw(new Error("expected message"));.

Before, some of the tests were not failing if an error is thrown -> the tests did not really test what was expected. Skipped one such test ("collection.get should error on empty embedding"). I will fix it in a next PR.

Use the jest standard Jest way for testing for rejected promises:
`await expect(...).rejects.throw(new Error("expected message"));`.

Before, some of the tests were not failing if an error is thrown -> the tests did not really test what was expected. Skipped one such test ("client.get should error on empty embedding"). I will fix it in a next PR.
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 4, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
chroma ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 4, 2024 8:08am

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 4, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

Please leverage this checklist to ensure your code review is thorough before approving

Testing, Bugs, Errors, Logs, Documentation

  • Can you think of any use case in which the code does not behave as intended? Have they been tested?
  • Can you think of any inputs or external events that could break the code? Is user input validated and safe? Have they been tested?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate property based tests?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate unit tests?
  • Should any logging, debugging, tracing information be added or removed?
  • Are error messages user-friendly?
  • Have all documentation changes needed been made?
  • Have all non-obvious changes been commented?

System Compatibility

  • Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system or backward compatibility?
  • Does this change intersect with any items on our roadmap, and if so, is there a plan for fitting them together?

Quality

  • Is this code of a unexpectedly high quality (Readability, Modularity, Intuitiveness)

@ibratoev ibratoev changed the title [CLN] Improve JS client error testing [CLN] Improve JS client async errors tests May 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant