Remove Print and use event system

[ChenyuLInx]

resolves #8756
Need dbt-labs/dbt-common#130

Problem

We want to have some event that

would still output to stdout when --quiet is specified,
without the timestamps in front
This PR does so by creating a specific event in dbt-common and implemented logic to have this event always passed to logger as 'error' level.

Solution

Switch to use the PrintEvent

Currently only downside is the original ListCmdOut event is being swapped to PrintEvent when log format is json.
info.code and info.name are changed.
@benmosher do you know if IDE rely on this somehow?

{"data": {"msg": "unit_test:jaffle_shop.test_does_location_opened_at_trunc_to_date"}, "info": {"category": "", "code": "Z052", "extra": {}, "invocation_id": "3b07892c-d070-4a64-8c45-781ee7c91616", "level": "info", "msg": "unit_test:jaffle_shop.test_does_location_opened_at_trunc_to_date", "name": "PrintEvent", "pid": 83408, "thread": "MainThread", "ts": "2024-05-16T21:49:13.211707Z"}}

previously it was

{"data": {"msg": "unit_test:jaffle_shop.test_does_location_opened_at_trunc_to_date"}, "info": {"category": "", "code": "Z049", "extra": {}, "invocation_id": "ab9df060-122b-4995-be78-93e451ce239f", "level": "info", "msg": "unit_test:jaffle_shop.test_does_location_opened_at_trunc_to_date", "name": "ListCmdOut", "pid": 93939, "thread": "MainThread", "ts": "2024-05-16T22:00:10.053990Z"}

TODO

• quiet behavior
• do we need custom behavior on this event(we can't now)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
• I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
• This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
• This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX
• This PR includes type annotations for new and modified functions

[github-actions]

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide.

[benmosher]

@ChenyuLInx to my knowledge, we only use ts and msg. but tag @naomiwritescode for more 👀 + 🧠

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.63%. Comparing base (ad61200) to head (2cf8ffc).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10131      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.58%   88.63%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         180      180              
  Lines       22436    22435       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits        19876    19885       +9     
+ Misses       2560     2550      -10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	86.10% <100.00%> (+0.15%)	⬆️
unit	63.18% <80.00%> (+0.18%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.