New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[office] Add 2019 for Mac, 2016 for Mac, 2004 for Mac, 2003, XP, Update releaseDate to RTM date #3993
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
See release links for RTM date
Relates to #3960
@@ -38,39 +52,60 @@ releases: | |||
|
|||
- releaseCycle: "2013" | |||
releaseLabel: "2013 SP1" | |||
releaseDate: 2014-02-25 | |||
releaseDate: 2013-01-09 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given support period overlap for 2013 and 2013 SP1 release, shouldn't we document those in separate entries ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since both releases are EOL, it should be okay to collapse it into a single row.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the feedback. MS sees these service packs as separate cycles:
Original Release -> Start: Jan 9, 2013, End: Apr 14, 2015
Service Pack -> Start: 1 Feb 25, 2014, End: Apr 11, 2023
We should add them also as additional cycles as we have it like in Windows with 23H2, etc. Will do that and update this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since both releases are EOL, it should be okay to collapse it into a single row.
This may not be very practical for API users because of the lack of consistency. I think we should either document major versions, or minor versions, but not mix both.
See release links for RTM date
Relates to #3960