BedJet: expose the outlet temperature on the climate and as a sensor

[javawizard]

What does this implement/fix?

• The bedjet climate platform now takes a temperature_source option that can be used to tell it whether to use the temperature of the air being discharged by the BedJet or the ambient temperature of the room it's in as the source of the climate entity's current temperature
• Both temperatures can now be exposed via sensor platform entities
• The bedjet_id: option is now optional on the climate entity (and the newly-introduced sensor entities) when only one bedjet: hub is defined

Types of changes

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Other

Pull request in esphome-docs with documentation (if applicable): esphome/esphome-docs#3799

Test Environment

• ESP32
• ESP32 IDF
• ESP8266
• RP2040
• BK72xx
• RTL87xx

Example entry for config.yaml:

# Example config.yaml

bedjet:
  # ...

climate:
  - platform: bedjet
    name: My BedJet
    temperature_source: outlet

sensor:
  - platform: bedjet
    ambient_temperature:
      name: "My BedJet Ambient Temperature"
    outlet_temperature:
      name: "My BedJet Outlet Temperature"

Checklist:

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works (under tests/ folder).

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated in esphome-docs.

[probot-esphome]

Hey there @jhansche, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (bedjet) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.21%. Comparing base (4d8b5ed) to head (a98fbb4).
Report is 603 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #6633      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.70%   54.21%   +0.50%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        9408     9594     +186     
  Branches     1654     1691      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits         5053     5201     +148     
- Misses       4056     4069      +13     
- Partials      299      324      +25     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[javawizard]

This is still a draft - I accidentally hit the button early. Sorry for the noise!

[javawizard]

Alright this is ready for review!

[probot-esphome]

Hey there @jhansche, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (bedjet) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[jhansche]

Thank you for this! The code looks good - with a minor suggestion for reducing code duplication.

[javawizard]

@jhansche - responded and pushed changes, let me know if you have any more questions!

[jhansche]

Nice, and thanks for the PR!
Just FYI, I can't approve it for merge, but looks good

[javawizard]

No worries @jhansche, I assume @jesserockz will be along soon enough to click the button.

Thanks for taking a look at this! (And thanks for writing this awesome component in the first place 😄)

[esphome]

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

[probot-esphome]

Hey there @jhansche, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (bedjet) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[jhansche]

LGTM
@javawizard not sure if Jesse filters his view, but it might help to dismiss/re-request review to show that you've made the changes

[probot-esphome]

Hey there @jhansche, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (bedjet) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}