Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default project structure tree #246

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jonchurch
Copy link
Member

@jonchurch jonchurch commented Feb 1, 2020

Adds default project structure to readme:

.
├── app.js
├── bin
│   └── www
├── package-lock.json
├── package.json
├── public
│   ├── images
│   ├── javascripts
│   └── stylesheets
│       └── style.css
├── routes
│   ├── index.js
│   └── users.js
└── views
    ├── error.jade
    ├── index.jade
    └── layout.jade

Open to suggestions here. Definitely I think that there should be some explanation about the structure, but as it stands just adding this to the readme (IMO) improves the project because it documents things as they currently are.

This is in reference to #62, where I think we can continue to talk about documenting the structure.

@jonchurch
Copy link
Member Author

I'm sorry, this is off topic but @dougwilson HOW did you label this seconds after I submitted?? Do you have automation setup to do that?

@dougwilson
Copy link
Contributor

I interact with GitHub through email and I see & read just about every message that comes in as it comes in :) Depending on what I'm doing at the time I may or may not interact with it, depending on how much time it would take. I manually labeled it when I saw the email and was planning to take a closer look later, haha :)

@helio-frota helio-frota self-requested a review June 20, 2020 05:34
@helio-frota
Copy link

The CI error is not related to the update on README.md. It seems to be a flakey travis build.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants