Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add enum based rust solution for binarytrees #385

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

reflix
Copy link

@reflix reflix commented Apr 17, 2023

Hello,

I found an optimisation to the rust solution of the binary_trees algorithm (5.rs) by switching from structs to enums
in combination with rust's powerful match expression. This replaces multiple if expressions with a single match expression within TreeNode::check(&self) allowing the check function to be written in a functional style.

Further improvements are heavily appreciated :)

hyperfine shows a slight performance improvement (on my machine, unverified) using rustc 1.68.2 (9eb3afe9e 2023-03-27)

5.rs yields

Benchmark 1: target/release/binary_tree 15
Time (mean ± σ): 109.7 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 105.0 ms, System: 4.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 108.4 ms … 112.2 ms 27 runs

Benchmark 1: target/release/binary_tree 20
Time (mean ± σ): 5.377 s ± 0.018 s [User: 5.086 s, System: 0.286 s]
Range (min … max): 5.362 s … 5.408 s 10 runs

6.rs yields

Benchmark 1: target/release/binary_tree 15
Time (mean ± σ): 106.1 ms ± 0.5 ms [User: 101.4 ms, System: 4.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 105.0 ms … 107.4 ms 27 runs

Benchmark 1: target/release/binary_tree 20
Time (mean ± σ): 5.201 s ± 0.018 s [User: 4.918 s, System: 0.280 s]
Range (min … max): 5.177 s … 5.230 s 10 runs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant