Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blip dynamic input resolution #30722

Merged

Conversation

zafstojano
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

This PR adds ability to handle dynamic input image resolutions to the BLIP family of models.

Addresses #30579

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline,
    Pull Request section?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue or the forum? Please add a link
    to it if that's the case.
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the
    documentation guidelines, and
    here are tips on formatting docstrings.
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

Ping: @amyeroberts

Copy link
Collaborator

@amyeroberts amyeroberts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing work - thanks for adding this!

Just a small Q on the test outputs. Once sense-checked we'll be good to merge!

inputs = processor(images=image, return_tensors="pt").to(torch_device)

predictions = model.generate(**inputs, interpolate_pos_encoding=True)
self.assertEqual(predictions[0].tolist(), [30522, 1037, 2450, 3564, 2006, 1996, 3509, 2007, 1037, 3899, 102])
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you checked the generated ids here to make sure they make sense for the picture i.e.:

processor.batch_decode([30522, 1037, 2450, 3564, 2006, 1996, 3509, 2007, 1037, 3899, 102])

@zafstojano
Copy link
Contributor Author

@amyeroberts good point!

the tests now also have a check for the textual content.

Copy link
Collaborator

@amyeroberts amyeroberts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing work - thanks for adding this!

@amyeroberts amyeroberts merged commit f63d822 into huggingface:main May 13, 2024
21 checks passed
@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants