Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add IO estimation based query mode decider #16696

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chenzl25
Copy link
Contributor

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@chenzl25 chenzl25 requested a review from fuyufjh May 14, 2024 02:43
Copy link
Contributor

@fuyufjh fuyufjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A first step toward CBO 😄

I'd like to be cautious. The current state looks more predictable to me. Welcome for comments from more people.

Copy link
Member

@BugenZhao BugenZhao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The implementation LGTM

Comment on lines +31 to +33
let mut decider = ExecutionModeDecider {
estimated_scan_io_bytes: 0,
};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to make it a method like Decider::new.

if let Some(table_stat) = reader
.table_stats()
.table_stats
.get(&batch_seq_scan.core().table_catalog.id().table_id())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Is it possible that there are multiple Scan node for the same table? Should we deduplicate them when estimating the scan bytes considering block cache?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feat: decide batch query execution mode based on IO estimation
3 participants