Added a new Example: Sets discriminating values? #97
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Deep down we're all the same: Input-Output formatting of the explanation code https://github.com/satwikkansal/wtfpython#-deep-down-were-all-the-same-
Ref. example: Deep down, we're all the same
Syncing the forked repository
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Section: Appearences are deceptive!
(Open to any recommendations to add it to another section)
Link (not yet added in the table of contents): Sets discriminating values?
Concept: A set object in python never sorts its values by itself in any specific order.
The example illustrates that somehow an odd value is left off from being sorted by set.
The explanation clarifies that indeed neither of any values are being sorted.
Every sample is tested on 3.6.6 interactive interpreter and they should work for all the Python versions