Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Call complete listeners exclusively when the actor reaches its done status #4609

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Andarist
Copy link
Member

related to #4608

this removes the ability to listen for "on stop" but complete was already not called in different scenarios for stopped snapshots:

  • like in subscribe here
  • or like when starting an actor with a rehydrated stopped snapshot here

So this is currently inconsistent, one way or another, and we should unify it. When it comes to the "on stop" listener - personally, I just don't see a lot of use cases for it. A different modeling approach is always possible and I'd prefer to steer people towards explicit modeling and away from adding implicit ad-hoc logic in listeners like this.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 20, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 984bdfa

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
xstate Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2023

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 984bdfa:

Sandbox Source
XState Example Template Configuration
XState React Template Configuration

@davidkpiano
Copy link
Member

For "on stop", which is still an important "event" to listen for, we can just listen for the snapshot status === 'stopped', right?

Copy link
Member

@davidkpiano davidkpiano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked, and this PR removed the ability to listen for an actor stopping. I added code to enable this (tests pass locally, not sure why they're failing in CI), can you please review?

@Andarist
Copy link
Member Author

For "on stop", which is still an important "event" to listen for

Why? 😉 Whenever I think about it, I always conclude that I wouldn't ever want to listen to it. subscribe is currently mainly used to notify people about a meaningful change in the underlying data and I think that, more often than not, people wouldn't consider a stopped snapshot something that they need to account for. The stopped snapshot is important for us internally but users should rarely interact with it in their code.

I think it's important to back up the claim of its importance with some real-life use cases oriented on app development and their needs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants