Update prompt.jinja2 with an example for more consistent format reply (https://github.com/stitionai/devika/issues/429) #438
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Changed the prompt by giving an example for more consistent replies as sometimes the plan doesn't show up. Issue: stitionai#429
|
What exactly did you change? |
|
The code prompt also has problems with LLAMA and some other models. Any way to improve that? |
What issue exactly did you face? |
Invalid response from the models. They don't give the response in the correct format for Devika. |
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changed the prompt by giving an example for more consistent replies as sometimes the plan doesn't show up. Issue: #429
name: Addition of example in prompt of Planner for more consistent replies (#429)
Description
*[ ] Added an example for Planner to give more consistent replies not leaving blank in Plan when planning for a task.
Explain what existing problem does the pull request solve?
After adding an example, more consistent format of replies for planner comes, resulting in a non-empty plan (#429)