Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

txn: Fix the issue that CheckTxnStatus didn't make rollback on optimistic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity #16621

Conversation

MyonKeminta
Copy link
Contributor

What is changed and how it works?

Issue Number: Close #16620

What's Changed:

Fix the issue that CheckTxnStatus didn't make rollback on optimistic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity

Related changes

  • PR to update pingcap/docs/pingcap/docs-cn:
  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Release note

Fix the issue that CheckTxnStatus didn't make rollback on optimistic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity.

…stic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity

Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
…k-txn-status-not-protecting-rollback-on-optimistic-primary
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Mar 8, 2024

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • cfzjywxk
  • ekexium

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@MyonKeminta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/release

@MyonKeminta MyonKeminta marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2024 05:21
@cfzjywxk cfzjywxk added the type/bugfix Type: PR - Fix a bug label Mar 11, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@cfzjywxk cfzjywxk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

src/storage/txn/actions/check_txn_status.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Status: PR - There is already 1 approval label Mar 11, 2024
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/L and removed size/M labels Mar 11, 2024
lock_type: LockType::Put,
},
// Rollback of the txn@start_ts=7 will be missing as overlapped rollback is not
// hanlded.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@overvenus PTAL at changes to this test, thanks!

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Status: PR - There are already 2 approvals and removed status/LGT1 Status: PR - There is already 1 approval labels Mar 12, 2024
@MyonKeminta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2024

@MyonKeminta: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2024

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 3ca0b56

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Status: Can merge to base branch label Mar 12, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added this to the Pool milestone Mar 12, 2024
@MyonKeminta MyonKeminta deleted the m/fix-check-txn-status-not-protecting-rollback-on-optimistic-primary branch March 12, 2024 09:11
dbsid pushed a commit to dbsid/tikv that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2024
…stic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity (tikv#16621)

close tikv#16620

Fix the issue that CheckTxnStatus didn't make rollback on optimistic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity

Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: dbsid <chenhuansheng@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against tikv/tikv#release-6.5 from head ti-chi-bot:cherry-pick-16621-to-release-6.5: the GitHub API request returns a 403 error: {"message":"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit and have been temporarily blocked from content creation. Please retry your request again later. If you reach out to GitHub Support for help, please include the request ID B1F4:19253:26BF37B:3FCB805:66010D62.","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/overview/rate-limits-for-the-rest-api#about-secondary-rate-limits"}

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tikv that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
close tikv#16620

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@cfzjywxk
Copy link
Collaborator

cfzjywxk commented Mar 26, 2024

@MyonKeminta
We need to pick the fix to release-6.5 by hand.

@MyonKeminta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-cherry-picker

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #16722.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tikv that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2024
close tikv#16620

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2024
…stic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity (#16621) (#16722)

close #16620

Fix the issue that CheckTxnStatus didn't make rollback on optimistic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: MyonKeminta <9948422+MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #16804.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tikv that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2024
close tikv#16620

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
ti-chi-bot bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
…stic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity (#16621) (#16804)

close #16620

Fix the issue that CheckTxnStatus didn't make rollback on optimistic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: MyonKeminta <9948422+MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tikv that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
close tikv#16620

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #16954.

ti-chi-bot bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
…stic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity (#16621) (#16954)

close #16620

Fix the issue that CheckTxnStatus didn't make rollback on optimistic transaction's primary protected, which may break transaction atomicity

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: MyonKeminta <9948422+MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: MyonKeminta <MyonKeminta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
5 participants