Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

raftstore: fix a bug where snapshot file is not deleted in time #16977

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 16, 2024

Conversation

hbisheng
Copy link
Contributor

@hbisheng hbisheng commented May 9, 2024

What is changed and how it works?

Issue Number: Close #16976

What's Changed:

The issue is that if a leader fails to send a snapshot, it doesn't delete the 
snapshot file which may accumulate and waste disk space. The idle snapshot 
files will eventually be GCed, but that might take hours. The commit ensures 
that the snapshot file is also deleted on the error path. A new integration 
test was added which would fail without the fix. 

Related changes

  • PR to update pingcap/docs/pingcap/docs-cn:
  • Need to cherry-pick to the release branch

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Release note

None

The issue is that if a leader fails to send a snapshot, it doesn't delete the
snapshot file which may accumulate and waste disk space. The idle snapshot
files will eventually be GCed, but that might take hours.

Test Plan:
Added a new integration test that would fail without the fix.

Signed-off-by: Bisheng Huang <hbisheng@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 9, 2024

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Connor1996
  • SpadeA-Tang

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 9, 2024

Welcome @hbisheng!

It looks like this is your first PR to tikv/tikv 🎉.

I'm the bot to help you request reviewers, add labels and more, See available commands.

We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!



Thank you, and welcome to tikv/tikv. 😃

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 9, 2024

Hi @hbisheng. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tikv member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SpadeA-Tang
Copy link
Member

Do we have any situations that a snapshot is reused? @Connor1996

@Connor1996
Copy link
Member

Do we have any situations that a snapshot is reused? @Connor1996

Seems no

Copy link
Member

@Connor1996 Connor1996 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Status: PR - There is already 1 approval label May 10, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Status: PR - There are already 2 approvals and removed status/LGT1 Status: PR - There is already 1 approval labels May 10, 2024
@Connor1996
Copy link
Member

/merge

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 11, 2024

@Connor1996: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 11, 2024

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 5e9a46d

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Status: Can merge to base branch label May 11, 2024
@Connor1996
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 16, 2024

@hbisheng: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 3c2cbcf into tikv:master May 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added this to the Pool milestone May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution Type: PR - From contributors first-time-contributor ok-to-test release-note-none size/M status/can-merge Status: Can merge to base branch status/LGT2 Status: PR - There are already 2 approvals
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Raft snapshot file is not deleted if the leader fails to send it out
4 participants